← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./7508/2025bail granted

Md. Kalamuddin Ansari v. The State Of Bihar

2025-05-16Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7508 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-590 Year-2024 Thana- DAUDNAGAR District- Aurangabad ====================================================== Md. Kalamuddin Ansari Son of Late Yaseen Ansari Resident of Village - Chhaku Bigha, P.S. - Daudnagar, District - Aurangabad ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Ashok Singh, Advocate For the State :

Dr. Kumar Uday Pratap, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 16-05-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 108, 80(2), 61(1) and 3(5) of the B.N.S..

3. The prosecution case, in brief, is that marriage of daughter of informant was solemnized with co-accused Reyaz Alam on 25.05.2021. It is alleged that after marriage, all the accused persons named in the F.I.R., including this petitioner, subjected daughter of informant to cruelty and harassment due to non-fulfillment of dowry and later, they killed the victim.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. Petitioner is father-in-law of the deceased and is victim of over

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7508 of 2025(3) dt.16-05-2025 2/2 implication. Petitioner is separate in mess and property and has got no concern with the affairs of the deceased and her husband. Thrust of accusation is against husband of deceased, who is already in judicial custody. Moreover, charge-sheet has already been submitted. Petitioner has got clean antecedents and he is in custody since 18.12.2024.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, rival submissions, nature of accusation, period of custody and clean antecedents of the petitioner, the prayer for grant bail of to the petitioner is allowed.

7. Accordingly, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Daudnagar in connection with Daudnagar P.S. Case No. 590 of 2024.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T