Chandramani Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2090 of 2023 ====================================================== 1.

Chandramani Kumar son of Late Deo Narayan Yadav, Resident of Village - Sadwara, Postapur, P.O. - Pindaruch, P.S.- Keoti, District - Darbhanga, PIN - 847306.

2.

Abha Kumari, Daughter of Sri Rajendra Prasad Dev, Wife of Shiv Lal Deo, Resident of Village - Turki, P.O. - Mahuli, P.S. - Baheri, District - Darbhanga.

... ... Petitioners

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Additional Chief Secretary, Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Director, Primary Education, Bihar, Patna. 4.

The District Magistrate, Darbhanga.

5.

The District Education Officer, Darbhanga.

6.

The District Programme Officer (Establishment), Darbhanga. 7.

The Block Education Officer, Baheri, District - Darbhanga. 8.

The Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj - Dhanauli, Block Baheri, District - Darbhanga.

9.

The Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Raj- Dhanauli, Block Baheri, District - Darbhanga.

10.

Sanjay Kumar Rakesh, son of Not Known, Present Sarpanch of the , Gram Panchayat Raj - Dhanauli, Block Baheri, District - Darbhanga. ... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Alok Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Amit Bhushan, AC to GP- 17 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 27-07-2023 At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in view of the judgment of this Court in CWJC No. 16214 of 2019 (Md. Ataur Rahman and Others vs. The State of Bihar and Others) nothing remains for adjudication in the present case.

Patna High Court CWJC No.2090 of 2023(2) dt.27-07-2023 2/2

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that this writ application may be disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to seek their remedy, if any, available to them under the said judgment.

3. Learned counsel for the State is present and he has no objection to the aforementioned submission.

4. This writ application is, thus, disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to seek their remedy, if any, available to them under the judgment of this Court in CWJC No. 16214 of 2019. This Court would, however, make it clear that the order of this Court shall not give rise to any cause of action to the petitioners.

5.

This writ application stands disposed of accordingly.

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) tusharika/- U