Patna High CourtCR. MISC./8809/2025bail granted

Ishtekhar Alam @ Iftekhar Alam @ Munna v. The State Of Bihar

2025-04-08Mr. Justice Chandra Prakash Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8809 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-88 Year-2024 Thana- GAYA RAIL P.S. District- Gaya ====================================================== Ishtekhar Alam @ Iftekhar Alam @ Munna S/O Gulam Mohammad @ Md Gulam Rasul Resident of village- Gewal Bigha, P.S- Rampur, District- Gaya. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Satish Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Suresh Prasad Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 08-04-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Gaya Rail P.S. Case No. 88/2024 dated 07.05.2024 registered for the offence punishable u/s 379 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, a stolen motorcycle was recovered from the possession of the co-accused, Md. Hussain.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner is not named in the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8809 of 2025(2) dt.08-04-2025 2/2 F.I.R. The name of the petitioner has sprung up in the confessional statement of the co-accused, Md. Hussain who has been granted regular bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 05.08.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 52793 of 2024. The petitioner has two antecedents and he is on bail in both the cases as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 30.09.2024.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Gaya in connection with Gaya Rail P.S. Case No. 88/2024.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) atul/- U T