← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./5882/2019bail granted

Sanjeev Ram And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

2019-04-01Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5882 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-452 Year-2018 Thana- SARAIYA District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== 1.

Sanjeev Ram son of Chandeshwar Ram 2.

Jitendra Ram son of Chandeshwar Ram 3.

Rajeev Kumar @ Rajeev Ram son of Chandeshwar Ram 4.

Babita Devi wife of Manoj Ram 5.

Binod Ram son of Late Bhulan Ram 6.

Rajendra Bhagat son of Late Raam Bahadur Bhagat 7.

Chandeshwar Bhagat son of Ram Briksha Bhagat All petitioner nos.1 to 7 resident of Village - Bhagwanpur Baniya, P.S.- Saraiya, Distt.- Muzaffarpur, 8.

Heera Ram son of Bhola Ram Resident of Village - Jujharapur, P.S.- Saraiya, Distt.- Muzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Md. Shamimul Hoda For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms. Rina Sinha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 01-04-2019 This is an application for grant of anticipatory bail in connection with Saraiya P.S. Case No. 452 of 2018, disclosing offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 325, 354, 337, 338, 307 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation against the petitioners and several other accused persons is that they came over the land in dispute and assaulted the informant, his son and others by lathi and danda. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5882 of 2019(3) dt.01-04-2019 2/2 that no specific allegation has been attributed against any of the petitioner and one of the injured, who made the statement before the police in the hospital and has not named these petitioners and furthermore, the postmortem report shows only three injuries on the person of the deceased.

Heard learned A.P.P. as well as learned counsel for the informant, they have opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

Having heard both sides, considering the above submission, this application is allowed. Let the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M.-1st, West Muzaffarpur, in connection with Saraiya P.S. Case No. 452 of 2018, subject to the condition laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Amjad/- U T