Saddam Alam @ Sadab Hussain @ Sadab Alam v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7560 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-160 Year-2024 Thana- KHAGAUL District- Patna ====================================================== Saddam Alam @ Sadab Hussain @ Sadab Alam Son of Pappu Alam @ Mohammad Pappu @Md. Pappu Alam Resident of Village- Janipur Near Masjhid, P.S.- Janipur, Distt.- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Bijay Kumar Pandey, Adv For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Mukesh Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SINGH CHANDEL ORAL ORDER 08-05-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
2. This is the first regular bail application of the petitioner seeking his regular bail in connection with Khagaul P.S. Case No. 160/2024 registered for the offence under Section 366 (A) read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code Act.
3. According to the case of prosecution, age of the victim girl is about 15 years. On 21.05.2024, father of the victim girl lodged a report alleging therein that two named accused persons Shahid Alam and Siman were taken his minor girl with them. On the basis of report made by him offence has been registered. During course of investigation, the victim girl has been recovered and on the basis of her statement, the applicant has been arrested.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7560 of 2025(3) dt.08-05-2025 2/3
4. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. According to the statement recorded by the victim girl under section 164 of the Cr.P.C. She herself left her house and joined the company of the petitioner. He further submits that after recovery of the victim girl, she herself denied for her medical examination, therefore, there is no any evidence available on record to implicate the applicant for alleged the crime in question. He further submits that applicant is in custody since 22.05.2024. Trial is still going on, it will take some more time, therefore it is prayed that applicant may be granted benefit of bail.
5. Learned counsel for the State opposes the arguments raised by the counsel for the petitioner.
6. Considering the above submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and further considering the statement of the victim girl recorded under Section 164 of Cr.P.C. and further considering the detention period of the applicant, I am of the view that the petitioner should be enlarged on bail.
7. Accordingly, the application is allowed.
8. The petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of A.C.J.M-V,
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7560 of 2025(3) dt.08-05-2025 3/3 Danapur, in connection with Khagaul P.S. Case No. 160/2024. (Arvind Singh Chandel , J) krishnakant/- U T