Patna High CourtCR. MISC./22814/2016bail granted

Ravi Ranjan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2016-05-26Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.22814 of 2016 (2) dt.26-05-2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.22814 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -26 Year- 2016 Thana -PAROO District- MUZAFFARPUR ======================================================

1. Ravi Ranjan Kumar S/o Shri Satendra Singh, Resident of villageBhilwara Dakshini, P.S.- Saraiya, District- Muzaffarpur .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pranav Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Surendra Kumar(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 26-05-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Paru P.S. Case No. 26 of 2016 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 414, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegedly, two ATM cards and one mobile were recovered from conscious possession of the petitioner when the petitioner and two others were found standing outside the ATM Booth and accordingly, the petitioner and others were apprehended. Submission is of false implication and that one of the ATM card is of the petitioner whereas the another ATM card is of his cousin brother Bablu Kumar. The petitioner is in custody since 21.02.2016 and other co-accused Gaurav Singh has already been allowed bail vide Cr. Misc. No. 18719 of 2016 to which learned

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.22814 of 2016 (2) dt.26-05-2016 APP does not dispute.

In the facts and circumstances stated above, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Jay Aditya Kumar Singh, J.M. Ist Class, Muzzafarpur in connection with Paru P.S. Case No. 26 of 2016, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) avin/- U T