← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./6118/2026bail rejected

Rahul Kumar Ray @ Rahul Ray v. The State Of Bihar

2026-02-11Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6118 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-84 Year-2025 Thana- GADHPURA District- Begusarai ====================================================== Rahul Kumar Ray @ Rahul Ray S/o Rambadan Rai @ Bholi Rai @ Tokho Rai @ Ram Badan Roy R/o Village - Bahattar, Bargaon (Shashan), Ward No. 02, Ajalatpur, P.S - Hasanpur, District - Samastipur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Advocate For the State :

Md. Aslam Ansari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 11-02-2026 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. As per prosecution case, informant, namely Ram Shogarat Yadav, alleged that on 26.07.2025 at about 6:30 PM, when he was returning from Garhpura Bazar and reached near Singhania Dharmsala, in the meantime, one unidentified person came on a Scorpio vehicle bearing Registration No. BR01FZ8178 and assaulted on the head of informant by means of butt of pistol, fired in the air and thereafter, fled away.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6118 of 2026(2) dt.11-02-2026 2/2

4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. Petitioner is not named in the F.I.R.. Name of petitioner transpired in this case during investigation.

5. On the other hand, learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner and submitted that name of petitioner transpired in this case during course of investigation and it has come that this petitioner, along with other accused persons, assaulted informant with butt of pistol. Petitioner has got fifteen criminal antecedents some of which are of similar nature.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, materials that have surfaced during course of investigation and criminal antecedents of the petitioner, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is rejected. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T