Patna High CourtCWJC/3192/2019disposed

Raj Narayan Prasad Yadav v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2019-02-20Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3192 of 2019 ====================================================== Raj Narayan Prasad Yadav, Gender-Male, aged about 69 years, Son of Late Rajvanshi Ray, Resident of Village- Kewatiya, P.O.- Dariyapur, P.S.- Dariyapur, Dist.- Saran Chapra.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Director of Agriculture, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2. The District Magistrate, Saran, Chapra.

3. The Joint Director of Agriculture, Saran Division, Chapra.

4. The District Agriculture Officer, Saran, Chapra. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Deonath Prasad, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Gajendra Prasad Yadav (SC 17) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT Date :- 20-02-2019 The petitioner seeks a direction to the respondent authorities to grant him the benefits of 3rd M.A.C.P. in Pay-Band 2 to which he is entitled. The petitioner has served for more than three decades as a Jansevak and has superannuated on 31.10.2010. Though he has been paid the 1st and 2nd A.C.Ps., but the benefits of the M.A.C.P. has not been extended to him. The

Patna High Court CWJC No.3192 of 2019 dt.20-02-2019 2/2 representation of the petitioner before the respondent authorities has yeilded it no positive response.

2. Under the aforesaid circumstances, this Court directs the petitioner to represent before the District Magistrate, Saran, Chapra (respondent No. 2), detailing his grievances and the details of the payment to which he is entitled, within a period of four weeks from today. On receipt of such representation, the same shall be disposed off by the concerned respondent within a further period of six weeks thereafter by a reasoned order. In case, the claim of the petitioner is found to be tenable, necessary sequel order shall be passed without any delay.

3. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition stands disposed off.

(Ashutosh Kumar, J) Praveen-II/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N/A Uploading Date 23.02.2019 Transmission Date N/A