Amirullah Ansari @ Alam v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6618 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-331 Year-2023 Thana- VIJAYEPUR District- Gopalganj ====================================================== Amirullah Ansari @ Alam S/o Dil Mohammad Ansari Resident of village - Rasulpur, P.S - Vijaipur, District - Gopalganj ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Dharmveer, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Parmanand Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 18-03-2026 Heard Mr.Dharmveer, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the informant and Mr.Parmanand Kumar, learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since 22.04.2024 in connection with Vijaipur P.S. Case No. 331 of 2023, F.I.R. dated 07.11.2023 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 417/354(c)/376 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 66(E)/67(A) of I.T.Act.
3. Earlier the prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected twice vide orders dated 25.09.2024 and 20.06.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. Nos. 57788 of 2024 and 24679 of 2025 respectively. Thereafter, the petitioner has again moved for bail which was dismissed as withdrawn with liberty on 15.11.2025 passed in Cr.Misc. No. 78971 of 2025.
4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6618 of 2026(3) dt.18-03-2026 2/2 submits that the petitioner is in custody since 22.04.2024 and the trial is not in progress.
5. Vide order dated 31.01.2026, a report was called for with regard to the stage of the trial. Report of the learned Trial Court dated 16.02.2026 reveals that all the chargesheete witnesses have been examined.
6. Learned counsel for the informant and learned APP for the State, on the other hand, have vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
7. Considering the nature of allegation against the petitioner in the FIR as well as the report of the learned Trial Court, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail in connection with Vijaipur P.S. Case No. 331 of 2023 pending in the court of learned Addl. Sessions Judge-I, Gopalganj.
8. Prayer is refused.
9. However, the learned Trial Court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same at the earliest. (Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Nitesh/- U T