Ajay Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9462 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-83 Year-2025 Thana- Parasi District- Arwal ====================================================== Ajay Singh S/o Late Dani Singh R/o Village - Makhdumabad, P.S - Parasi, District - Arwal ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Anil Prasad Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 26-03-2026
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 118(2), 109, 352, 351(3) and 3(5) of the BNS, 2023.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that his neighbour Ajay was having an altercation with his son Raju at the shop of Bhagwan Singh, where the son of the informant, Upendra, was also present and he intervened to stop the altercation when Ajay and Raju assaulted Upendra by lathi, further Raju assaulted Upendra by sharp edged weapon causing injury on head, thereafter Rajesh and Raju assaulted the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9462 of 2026(2) dt.26-03-2026 2/3 informant by gandasa causing injury on head.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that the informant himself alleges that when his son intervened to stop the altercation in between the petitioner and his son Raju, the occurrence is alleged to have taken place. It is further submitted that petitioner was not even present at the place of occurrence. It is next submitted that petitioner is suffering from lungs cancer and is on chemotherapy, as would manifest from Annexure-2 to the anticipatory bail application, which is with regard to the treatment given to the petitioner for cancer by Paras Hospital, Patna. It is also submitted that even presuming what has been alleged is true without admitting then the injury suffered by the injured has been opined to be simple in nature, as would manifest from Annexure-3 to the anticipatory bail application.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the anticipatory bail application of the petitioner.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and taking into consideration Annexure-2, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9462 of 2026(2) dt.26-03-2026 3/3 arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Parasi P.S. Case No. 83 of 2025 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of BNSS.
7. Accordingly, the instant anticipatory bail application stands allowed.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishabh/- U T