Dilip Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9817 of 2017 ======================================================

1. Dilip Kumar Yadav S/o Sri Bhimal Yadav Resident of Village - Lakhanakhas, P.S. - Uchakagaon, District - Gopalganj. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Food and Consumer Protection Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Commissioner, Saran Division, Chapra.

3. The Collector cum District Magistrate, Gopalganj at Gopalganj.

4. The Sub Divisional Officer, Hathua, District - Gopalganj.

5. The Block Supply Officer, Uchkagaon, District - Gopalganj.

6. The Block Supply Inspector, Uchakagaon, District - Gopalganj. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Uday Pratap Singh For the State : Mr. Upendra Pratap Singh AC to Sc4 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 23-08-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

In the present writ petition, petitioner is challenging the order dated 9.5.2017 passed by the Collector, Gopalganj in Supply Appeal Case no.2 of 2017 by which he has affirmed the order of dated 21.12.2016 passed by the Sub Divisional Officer, Hathua, Gopalganj by which he has cancelled the licence.

There is provision of revision. The petitioner has approached this Court straight way without exhausting alternative remedy of revision.

Patna High Court CWJC No.9817 of 2017 (2) dt.23-08-2017 The petitioner should first exhaust the remedy. If the petitioner files revision within a period of one month from today, the revisional authority will be obliged to dispose of the revision within a period of five months from the date of filing of the revision application.

With the aforesaid observation and direction this writ petition is disposed of.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) Vinay/- U