Ram Babu Sahni v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.22464 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -177 Year- 2015 Thana -BELA District- SITAMARHI ====================================================== Ram Babu Sahni, Son of Sri Laxmi Sahni, Resident of Village- Olipur, P.S. Belsand, Distt- Sitamarhi.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Virendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Nirmal Kumar Sinha (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 24-05-2016 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned A.P.P for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Bela P.S. Case No. 177 of 2015 registered for the offence punishable under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code and 3⁄4 of Explosive Substance Act.

From perusal of the impugned order, it reveals that the name of the petitioner came in this case on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused Idrish Nut and thereafter the petitioner was arrested. He is in custody since 10.03.2016 but he has not been put on T.I.P. and nothing has been recovered from his conscious possession.

Submission is that in this case other co-accused Md. Alauddin, Chhotan Ram, Ram Charan Sahni and Idrish Nut have

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.22464 of 2016 (2) dt.24-05-2016 2/2 already been allowed bail by another co-ordinate bench of this Court and, as such, the petitioner also deserves sympathetic consideration.

The learned A.P.P submits that the petitioner is also an accused in another case.

In the facts and circumstances stated above, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sitamarhi in connection with Bela P.S. Case No. 177 of 2015, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J.) Mishra/- U T