← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/172/2019allowed

Dharmendra Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2019-05-06Mr. Justice Jyoti Saran,Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.172 of 2019 ====================================================== Dharmendra Kumar, S/o Lakhan Singh, R/o Village- Jagarnathpur, P/o Kariyadpur, P.S. Fatehpur, Gaya.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar, through the Principal Secretary, Excise Department of Prohibition Registration, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.

The Collector cum District Magistrate, Gaya.

3.

The Superintendent of Excise, Gaya.

4.

The Senior Superintendent of Police, Gaya.

5.

The Officer-in-charge of Fatehpur Police Station, District- Gaya. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

None For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Vivek Prasad- GP7 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN) Date : 06-05-2019 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner but learned counsel for the State is present.

The prayer is for provisional release of the motorcycle bearing Registration No.

BR02AE4014, Chassis No.

MBLJAO6AMG9J03324, Engine No. JAO6EJG9J03370, which has been seized in connection with Fatehpur P.S. Case No. 130 of 2018 for the offences punishable under Sections 272, 273, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30 (a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

It is stated by learned counsel for the State that confiscation

Patna High Court CWJC No.172 of 2019 dt.06-05-2019 2/3 proceeding is yet to be initiated. It is further stated that the seizure list reflects the seizure of 8 liters of country liquor. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking note of the nature of seizure made as well as the fact that the confiscation proceeding is yet to be initiated, we direct that the vehicle in question be released provisionally in favour of the petitioner on production of ownership and registration with respect to vehicle in question in his name before the designated Court below with two sureties to the extent of the value of the vehicle as indicated in the insurance document. The petitioner while submitting the sureties shall also furnish the following affidavits/undertakings: (i) That the vehicle in question has never been involved in any offence of similar nature in past and shall not indulge in similar offence in future.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in creating any third party right or interest in respect of the vehicle during the pendency of the confiscation proceeding, if any, and shall not alienate the vehicle during this period.

(iii) The petitioner shall furnish an undertaking to produce the vehicle before the confiscating authority as and when required. (iv) Prior to release of the vehicle, a Panchanama would be got prepared by the designated Court below wherein the photograph of the vehicle shall be taken and will be certified by the petitioner and the same shall be kept on record so that in future, if so required,

Patna High Court CWJC No.172 of 2019 dt.06-05-2019 3/3 it may be used as a secondary evidence. The petitioner shall furnish an undertaking not to challenge the said Panchanama in course of trial.

The release shall be allowed within a period of 14 days from the date of submission of the sureties and the undertakings as stated above. This release of the vehicle would, however, be subject to initiation and finalization of the confiscation proceeding. With the observations/directions above, this writ petition is allowed.

(Jyoti Saran, J) ( Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) amit/nasimulAFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N/A Uploading Date 16.05.2019 Transmission Date N/A