← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/5304/2020dismissed

Harendra Ram, v. The State Of Bihar

2024-04-20Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5304 of 2020 ====================================================== 1.

Harendra Ram, S/o Late Darshan Ram, Resident of Village - M.J.K. Nagar, Utaribari Pokhara Bettiah, Ward No. 6, P.S. Bettiah, District- West Champaran.

2.

Ajay Kumar, S/o Rajendra Ram, Resident of Village - Serva Muski, P.S. Matiariya District- West Champaran.

3.

Ravindra Kumar, S/o Ram Narayan Ram, Resident of Village - Golghar Park Road Patna, P.S. Gandhi Maidan, District- Patna. 4.

Nand Lal Paswan, S/o Khedu Paswan, Resident of Village- Narila, P.S. Chautarawa, District- West Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Home Department Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna. 3.

The Deputy Inspector General of Police Bihar (Personnel) Bihar, Patna. 4.

The Bihar Staff Selection Commission, through its Secretary, Bihar, Patna. 5.

The Chairman, Bihar Staff Selection Commission, Patna. 6.

Hemant Kumar, S/o Uma Kant Mishra, resident of Village New Chandmari, P.S. Banjaria, District- East Champaran.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Avinash, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Md.Nadim Seraj (GP-5) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 20-04-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the Bihar Staff Selection Commission, Patna.

2. It has been jointly submitted that the case is squarely covered by order passed by this Hon'ble Court in Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.535 of 2020 dated 05.07.2022 in which the case was dismissed with the following observations:-

Patna High Court CWJC No.5304 of 2020(2) dt.20-04-2024 2/2 "In view of the order of the Hon'ble Supreme Court limiting the relief to 133 persons, and no case having been made out by petitioners to claim appointment against advertisement No. 704 of 2004, there is no occasion for this Court to issue any direction for petitioners appointment.

The application is, therefore, devoid of merit and is dismissed."

3. Accordingly, this writ petition is hereby dismissed with the same observations as was observed in Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.535 of 2020 dated 05.07.2022. (Dr. Anshuman, J.) Divyansh/- U