Patna High CourtMJC/745/2017disposed

Rajeev Kumar Giri v. The North Bihar Power Distribution Company Limited Through Its Managing Director Sandip Kumar And

2017-08-16Mr. Justice Jyoti Saran2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.745 of 2017 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 23 of 2017 ====================================================== Rajeev Kumar Giri, S/o Late Shivji Giri, Resident of Mohalla - Uttari Hazipur, Yasoda Nagar, Ward No. 13, Near Sadar Hospital, Police Station - Chitragupta Nagar, District - Khagaria.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The North Bihar Power Distribution Company Limited, Patna through its Managing Director Sandip Kumar R Pudukalkatti, Vidyut Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.

2. Sandip Kumar R Pudukalkatti the Managing Director, Company Limited, Vidyut Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna

3. Diwakar Lal, the Executive Engineer, Electricity Supply, North Bihar Power Distribution Company Limited, Division, Khagaria.

4. Sanu Kumari, the Assistant Electric Engineer, Electric Supply Sub - Division, Urban North (Town), North Bihar Power Distribution Company Ltd. Khagaria.

.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Vinay Kirti Singh, Adv. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL ORDER 16-08-2017 By the order passed on the writ petition the Executive Engineer was directed to consider the grievance of the petitioner and issue the rectified bill. It was further directed that no sooner the petitioner would make the payment of the same his electricity line would be restored immediately within 24 hours. A show cause notice has been filed by the opposite party no. 3 in which it is stated that a rectified bill has been issued

Patna High Court MJC No.745 of 2017 (4) dt.16-08-2017 to the petitioner but which does not satisfy the petitioner. In my opinion by the issuance of the rectified bill, the order passed on the writ application has been complied and no contempt arises. The petitioner if so aggrieved by the rectified bill may take recourse to such remedy as available to him in law. The contempt application is, accordingly, disposed of.

(Jyoti Saran, J) Devendra/- U