Prawez Alam @ Md. Parwej v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4600 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-421 Year-2024 Thana- PURNEA SADAR District- Purnia ====================================================== Prawez Alam @ Md. Parwej Son of Md. Rejabul Resident of Mohalla -City Naka Chowk, PS -Sadar, Dist- Purnia ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner :
Md Ataul Haque, Advocate For the State :
Mr. Ram Naresh Ray, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 25-02-2025 Heard learned counsels for the parties.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 303(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S..
3. The prosecution case, in brief, is that on 24.07.2024, all the F.I.R. named accused persons, including this petitioner, stole the goods from truck of informant and sold it somewhere.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. From bare perusal of the F.I.R. it is apparent that informant is not an eye witness of the occurrence and petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case merely on suspicion. No stolen article has been recovered from conscious
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4600 of 2025(2) dt.25-02-2025 2/2 possession of this petitioner. Petitioner claims clean antecedents.
5. On the other hand, learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner and submitted that petitioner is named in the F.I.R. and there is specific and direct accusation that he, along with other accused persons, stole goods from truck of informant and sold it somewhere. It is further submitted that during investigation, this petitioner was seen with the stolen articles in a Toto whose CCTV footage is also available.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, specific and direct nature of accusation and material surfaced during course of investigation, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is rejected. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T