Zabi Roshan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5019 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-326 Year-2025 Thana- BAHADURGANJ District- Kishanganj ====================================================== Zabi Roshan Daughter of Zehrul Village -Kathamatha Dhanpatganj PS -Kochadhaman, Dist- Kishanganj ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Mritunjay Kumar, Advcocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Jagdhar Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 04-02-2026 Heard Mr. Mritunjay Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Jagdhar Prasad, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Bahadurganj P.S. Case No. 326 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Section 309(6) of the B.N.S., 2023.

3. The case of the prosecution in short is that unknown miscreants have looted a truck carrying vegetables and mobile phones and Rs. 600/- from the driver. The miscreants were in an Ertiga vehicle having registration no. WB-74BK-4417. It is also alleged that a lady was also there in the Ertiga vehicle. The case was filed against unknown miscreants.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. Learned

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5019 of 2026(2) dt.04-02-2026 2/2 counsel for the petitioner submits that during the course of investigation, from perusal of para 26 of the case diary, it appears that the informant identified the petitioner by seeing her photographs and afterwards she has given her confessional statement. Save and except the confessional statement, there is nothing against the petitioner. He also submits that nothing has been recovered from the possession of this petitioner. Moreover, the petitioner is a lady and she is languishing in judicial custody since 21.07.2025.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State and submits that the petitioner is having criminal antecedent of two cases.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M.-II, Kishanganj in connection with Bahadurganj P.S. Case No. 326 of 2025.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Sudhanshu/- U T