← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/1901/2019disposed

Raghubar Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2019-05-15Justice Smt. Nilu Agrawal2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1901 of 2019 ====================================================== Raghubar Singh, S/o Late Girja Singh 3-A, Kapila Residency, Buddha Colony, P.O.- G.P.O., Distt.-Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Building Construction, Patna 2.

The Chief Engineer, Building Construction Department (North Bihar), Patna 3.

The Superintending Engineer, Building Construction Department, Building Circle, Saharsa 4.

Bihar Industrial Area Development Authority, Patna through Secretary 5.

The Managing Director, Bihar Industrial Area Development Authority, Patna 6.

The Senior Account Officer, Bihar Industrial Area Development Authority, Patna 7.

The Branch Manager, Punjab National Bank, Muradpur, Khetan Market, Patna ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sunil Kumar Singh, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Sushil Kumar (Gp22) For BIADA : Mr. Kumar Priya Ranjan, Advocate Mr. Niraj Kumar, Advocate For the PNB : Mr. Siddharth Harsa, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. NILU AGRAWAL ORAL ORDER 15-05-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State, learned counsel for the Punjab National Bank and learned counsel appearing on behalf of Bihar Industrial Area Development Authority, Patna (hereinafter referred to as the 'BIADA').

2. Petitioner, who retired from the post of Accounts Clerk on 30.06.2009 from the Building Construction Department, claims contributory provident fund and GIC along with statutory interest from 01.03.1976 to 04.02.1994 while the

Patna High Court CWJC No.1901 of 2019(4) dt.15-05-2019 2/2 petitioner was posted at Patna Industrial Development Authority, which is now called as BIADA. The petitioner submits that he worked for the Patna Industrial Development Authority, which is now called BIADA from 01.03.1976 to 04.02.1994, hence, his contributory provident fund and GIC has to be paid by the BIADA.

3. Considering the nature of claim made by the petitioner, petitioner is directed to file a representation regarding his dues on account of contributory provident fund and GIC for the period he worked in Patna Industrial Development Authority, which will be disposed of by Respondent No. 6, the Senior Accounts Officer, BIADA within a period of three months from the date of filing of such representation. Any amount due to the petitioner along with statutory interest would be paid within a period of one month thereafter. If certain amounts are inadmissible, the same shall be communicated to the petitioner along with calculation chart by passing a speaking order sent through registered post.

4. Writ application stands disposed of accordingly. (Nilu Agrawal, J) Rajesh/- U