Ripu Yadav@Abhishek Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.7330 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-92 Year-2017 Thana- MAKHDUMPUR District- Jehanabad ====================================================== Ripu Yadav @ Abhishek Kumar, About Age 22 (Male), son of Kishori Kumar Ranjan @ Kishori Yadav, resident of Village - Panda Bigha, P.S.- Makhdumpur, O.P.- Tehta, Distt.- Jehanabad ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Arvind Prasad Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Nirmala Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 25-02-2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner seeks bail in Makhdumpur P.S. Case No. 92/2017 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147/148/341/323/324/307/379 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner is to have assaulted by sword upon the informant as a result of which he became injured, whereas co-accused persons took away some ornaments and Rs.1,50,000/- from the cash box of the shop of the informant.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. Similarly, situated co-accused persons have been granted bail as

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.7330 of 2019(2) dt.25-02-2019 2/2 contained in Annexure 2. Petitioner is in custody since 25.10.2018.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Jehanabad in connection with Makhdumpur P.S. Case No. 92/2017, with following conditions:- (1)Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the court below.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) Sanjay/- U T