Karanti Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.32166 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -79 Year- 2015 Thana -BARH District- PATNA ====================================================== Karanti Kumar Son of Rajo Mahto, Resident of Village - Bhadaur, P.S. - Bhadaur, District - Patna.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Kashyap, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Asha Devi, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMARESH KUMAR LAL ORAL ORDER 17-08-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 379 of IPC for committing the theft of a Sumo Vista vehicle.

It is submitted that FIR has been lodged against unknown. Later on, the petitioner was apprehended with this vehicle and for which Sarmera P. S. Case No. 25 of 2015 was lodged against him for the offence punishable under Section 414 IPC in which he has been granted bail. The petitioner has been in custody in the present case since 30.5.2015.

It is further submitted that after investigation charge-sheet has already been submitted and there is

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.32166 of 2015 (2) dt.17-08-2015 2/2 no chance of tampering with the witnesses.

Learned counsel for the State submits that the petitioner is also involved in another case.

Considering the facts and circumstances, the above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M., Barh, Patna/court concerned after framing of charge in Barh P. S. Case No. 79 of 2015 with following conditions:-

1. The petitioner will not indulge himself in similar or any other offence.

2. One of the bailors must be the close relative of the petitioner.

3. The petitioner will be well represented in the Court on each and every date and in case of absence for two consecutive dates or in case of violation of terms of bail, his bail bond would be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(Amaresh Kumar Lal, J) Kanchan/- U T