← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/2592/2020dismissed

Khushbu Kumari, v. The State Of Bihar,

2023-08-22Mr. Justice Madhuresh Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2592 of 2020 ====================================================== Khushbu Kumari, wife of Sharwan Kumar, resident of Village- Jharwa, Panchayat- Bakuniya, Ward No. - 10, P.S.- Nauhatta, District- Saharsa. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar, through the Secretary, Social Welfare Department Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Director, the Integrated Child Development Service Directorate, Social Welfare Department Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The District Magistrate, District- Saharsa.

4.

The District Programme Officer, District- Saharsa. 5.

The Child Development Project Officer, Block- Nauhatta, District- Saharsa. 6.

The Members of the Selection Committee, Anganwari Sewika/ Sahayika, Ward No. - 10, Centre Name- Jharwa Tola, Anganwari Centre No. 161, Panchayat- Bakuniya, P.S.- Nauhatta, District- Saharsa. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Jitendra Kumar Giri, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Md.Raisul Haque (SC10) Md. Obaidullah, AC to SC-10 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER 22-08-2023 1.

Petitioner alleges that the process for selection of Aanganwadi Sevika to Centre No. 161 situated at villageJharwa Tola, Panchayat- Bakuniya, District- Saharsa, was not in accordance with the guidelines.

2.

It is not in dispute that the Directorate of Integrated Child Development Services (ICDS) has issued guidelines for selection of Aanganwadi Sevika/Sahayika wherein the remedy of appeal/revision has been provided under Clause 12 of the 2019 Guidelines.

Patna High Court CWJC No.2592 of 2020(2) dt.22-08-2023 2/2 3.

This Court is of the opinion that in view of such adequate efficacious remedy wherein all disputed issues being raised in the instant proceedings can be considered by the authorities, there is no occasion for this court to exercise its extra ordinary writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

4.

The petitioner would be at liberty to avail remedy in accordance with the guidelines.

5.

Writ application is dismissed with liberty.

(Madhuresh Prasad, J) SUMIT/- U