Patna High CourtCR. MISC./4559/2020dismissed

Rama Yadav @ Ram Naresh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2020-01-23Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4559 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-239 Year-2019 Thana- LAUKAHI District- Madhubani ====================================================== RAMA YADAV @ RAM NARESH YADAV Son of Badri Yadav @ Badri Narayan Yadav Resident of Village- Singrahi, P.S.- Laukahi, DistrictMadhubani. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Gagan Deo Yadav, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Parmanand Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 23-01-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner in this case is seeking regular bail in connection with Laukahi P.S. Case No. 239 of 2019 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 272, 273, 414 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a)of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has no concern with the vehicle from which the alleged 405 liters illicit liquor has been recovered. The petitioner is said to have escaped on seeing the Police. However, learned APP for the State submits that the petitioner is said to have fled away on seeing the raiding party, from the vehicle from which huge quantity of illicit liquor has been recovered and is in custody only since 19.12.2019. He has

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4559 of 2020(2) dt.23-01-2020 2/2 also a criminal antecedent of the same nature. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case wherein the name of the petitioner has transpired in this case and has been involved while being on bail in another case of similar nature, this Court taking into consideration the period of custody, at this stage, is not inclined to grant regular bail to the petitioner. His prayer for bail is refused.

The petitioner may, however, renew his prayer for bail after expiry of a reasonable period.

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) avin/- U T