Sudina Devi v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8660 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-213 Year-2021 Thana- LAUKAHA District- Madhubani ====================================================== 1.
Sudina Devi wife of Late Rajdev Hazara Village- Baghamariya Ps- Laukaha DistMadhubani 2.
Reena Devi wife of Sanoj Hazara Village- Baghamariya Ps- Laukaha DistMadhubani 3.
Sabita Kumari wife Anil Kumar Yadav Village- Baghamariya Ps- Laukaha DistMadhubani 4.
Atish Kumar Yadav son of Late Rajdev Yadav Village- Baghamariya Ps- Laukaha Dist- Madhubani 5.
Sanoj Hazara @ Sanoj Yadav son of Late Rajdev Hazara Village- Baghamariya PsLaukaha Dist- Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Ravi Prakash, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Ram Sevak Choudhary, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA ORAL ORDER 20-02-2024
1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the State.
2. The accused/petitioners are named in F.I.R. and apprehending their arrest in connection with Laukaha P.S. Case No. 213 of 2021, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 406, 420, 384 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. The allegation against above named petitioners is to sell a piece of land belongs to informant on the basis of forged documents.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8660 of 2024(2) dt.20-02-2024 2/2 petitioners submitted that the husband of the informant and the husbands of petitioners nos. 1, 2, and 3 are own brothers and they are co-sharer of disputed piece of land. It is further submitted that the dispute between the parties is purely of civil in nature. While concluding the argument, it is submitted that petitioners nos. 1, 2 and 3 are ladies of clean antecedent and petitioners nos. 4 and 5 are also men of clean antecedent.
5. Learned APP opposes the prayer of bail.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances and by taking note of fact as petitioners are wife of the cosharer, accordingly, all above named petitioners, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned trial Court, within a period of four weeks of the order, are directed to be released on bail furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-II, Madhubani/concerned Court, where the case is pending in connection with Laukaha P.S. Case No. 213 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Chandra Shekhar Jha, J) archana/- U T