Ajay Mishra v. The Bihar State Power Holding Company Limited Through Its Chairman And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8715 of 2017 ===========================================================

1. Ajay Mishra son of Late Vishwapati Mishra resident of Nepali Nagar (Shiv Nandan Nagar, Ghurdaur Road), P.S. Ashiyana Nagar, P.S. Rajiv Nagar, District Patna.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The Bihar State Power Holding Company Limited through its Chairman.

2. The South Bihar Power Distribution Company Limited through its Managing Director.

3. The Assistant Electrical Engineer, South Bihar Power Distribution Company Limited, Electric Supply Sub-Division, Digha, Patna. .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay MIshra For the Respondent/s : Mr. Vinay Kirti Singh =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 26-07-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the Bihar State Power Holding Company. A grievance has been raised by the petitioner that he fulfills all the conditions even then the Power Holding Company has refused to grant connection in his house which has been constructed by him as his application for connection of power has been refused to be taken on the ground that some higher authorities has prevented to accept the same. As per claim of the petitioner he has constructed a house over the plot 1251, Zamabandi No.3750 situated in Ghurdaur

Patna High Court CWJC No.8715 of 2017 dt.26-07-2017 Road, Rajiv Nagar.

Learned counsel for the Power Holding Company submits that actually the petitioner has not filed application for connection.

In such view of the matter, petitioner is directed to file an application along with details of land. If such an application is filed the Power Holding Company will be obliged to grant power to the petitioner subject to deposit of fee and charges as per law but this order will not create any assemblance of right title and possession of petitioner over the land but will always be subject to result of proceeding if any pending. With the aforesaid observation and direction this writ petition is disposed of.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) Vinay/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 29.7.2017 Transmission Date NA