Manil Ram @ Munil Ram v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6676 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-920 Year-2025 Thana- SIKARPUR District- West Champaran ====================================================== Manil Ram @ Munil Ram S/o Sohan Ram R/o Nankar Motihari, ward no. 15, Rakhani, P.S.- Shikarpur, Distt.- West Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Bimlesh Kumar Pandey For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Madan Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT KUMAR ORAL ORDER 04-02-2026 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Shikarpur P.S. Case No. 920 of 2025, F.I.R dated 16.09.2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 351(2), 352 & 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
3. According to prosecution case, six accused persons has attacked the informant when he was going to his Ghotha (Cattle Shed) and upon attacked he got injury on his head.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegations against this petitioner is general and omnibus and nothing specific is alleged against this petitioner while there is a counter case, which is said to have been instituted by this petitioner, where the mother of this petitioner is said to have
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6676 of 2026(2) dt.04-02-2026 2/3 sustained injury in which the allegations of threating and assault is against the informant and the family members, who are said to have entered the house of this petitioner in a drunken state and assaulted the informant and his mother with lathi. It is next submitted that the injury, which is said to have been caused to the informant of the instant case have been found to be simple, which have been referred by the petitioner from the impugned order.
5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail application.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances that there is a case and counter case from both the sides. Accordingly, this Court is inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
7. Let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his/her arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M. VI, Bettiah, West Champaran in connection with Shikarpur P.S. Case No. 920 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6676 of 2026(2) dt.04-02-2026 3/3 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure / Section 482(2) of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita and with other following conditions:- (i) one of the bailors should be the family member/relative of the petitioner(s) who shall provide official document to show his/her bona fide;
(ii) the petitioner(s) shall appear on each and every date before the Trial Court and failure to do so for two consecutive dates without plausible reason will entail cancellation of his/her/their bail bond by the Trial Court itself; (iii) the petitioner(s) shall in no way try to induce or promise or threat the witnesses or tamper with the evidences, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of the bail bonds;
(iv) the petitioner(s) shall desist from committing any criminal offence again, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of their bail bonds. (Ajit Kumar, J) abhishekkr/- U T