Vinod Ram v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4924 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1094 Year-2025 Thana- AHIYAPUR District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Vinod Ram Son of Late Mishri Lal Ram Resident of Village- Kolhua Chowk, Garam Chowk Road No. 1, Kolhua Paigambarpur, P.S.- Ahiyapur, DistrictMuzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Yugal Kishore, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Awadhesh Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 04-02-2026 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and Learned APP for the State.
2. The present criminal miscellaneous application has been filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter referred to as 'the BNSS, 2023') for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner who apprehends arrest in connection with Ahiyapur P.S. Case No. 1094 of 2025, lodged on 04.08.2025, under Sections 126(2)/115(2)/118(1) /352 /351(2)/351(3)/3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023.
3. As per the prosecution, FIR has been lodged against two named accused persons including the present petitioner with allegation that after taking wine he has
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4924 of 2026(2) dt.04-02-2026 2/3 assaulted the informant's daughter, due to which she became unconscious and admitted to hospital. It has also been alleged that he was continuously threatening to assault by knife.
4. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Counsel submits that antecedent of the petitioner is clean and he ready to fulfill all the conditions whatsoever shall be imposed upon him. Counsel submits that both informant and petitioner's side are well known to each other. He submits that the entire allegation is false. He submits that there were two accused persons one of them was granted anticipatory bail at the level of Sessions Court itself. Counsel submits that allegation of knife is wrong as injury has been caused by hard and blunt substance.
5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits that there is specific allegation against the petitioner to assault by knife to the daughter of the informant.
6. In the present facts and circumstances, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Hence, the prayer for anticipatory bail is hereby refused. However, in the event of surrender of the petitioner within
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4924 of 2026(2) dt.04-02-2026 3/3 four weeks from today, the prayer for regular bail shall be considered on the same day without being prejudiced by the order of this Court.
(Dr. Anshuman, J) Mkr./- U T