← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./6289/2026bail granted

Manish Kumar @ Chandan Kumar @ Sonu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2026-02-04Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6289 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-146 Year-2025 Thana- RUPASPUR District- Patna ====================================================== Manish Kumar @ Chandan Kumar @ Sonu Kumar Son of Surendra Ray Resident of Village- Bhagwatipur, Ward No. 2, P.O.- Neora, P.S.- Shahpur, District- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ramkishor Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Rabindra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 04-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Rupaspur P.S. Case no. 146 of 2025 registered under sections 304(2) and 112(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3. As per the prosecution case, the informant states that on coming out of the mandir, two accused persons on a motorcycle snatched her golden chain from around her neck and escaped.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the FIR was registered against unknown. The name of the petitioner transpired in course of investigation and the police is mainly basing their case on the confessional statement of the petitioner made before

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6289 of 2026(2) dt.04-02-2026 2/2 police. No incriminating article has been recovered from the petitioner's possession and the cause of his false implication is his antecedents. The petitioner is in custody since 19.5.2025 and chargesheet has been submitted in the case.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the allegations in the FIR, the material that has transpired in course of investigation as is evident from the order of the learned trial Court, no incriminating article having been recovered from the petitioner's possession, the petitioner having remained in custody for eight months since 19.5.2025 and chargesheet having been submitted in the case, the Court directs the petitioner to be enlarged on bail in connection with Rupaspur P.S. Case no. 146 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-III, Danapur.

(Partha Sarthy, J) sauravkrsinha/- U T