Patna High CourtCR. MISC./8534/2024dismissed

Golu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2024-02-22Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8534 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1733 Year-2023 Thana- NAWADA District- Nawada ====================================================== Golu Kumar S/o Sumit Kumar @ Alok Kumar R/o Vill - Ohari, P.S. - Nawada Nagar, O.P. - Kadirganj, Dist. - Nawada ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Bhaskar Shankar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Arun Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 22-02-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Nawada (Town) P.S. Case No. 1733 of 2023 registered for the offence under Section 379, 420, 411/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner is alleged to have tried to steal money from the ATM by using a ten inch sheet.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that other co-accused has already been granted bail by this Court.

5. It is also submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is in jail since 08.11.2023.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8534 of 2024(2) dt.22-02-2024 2/2

6. Learned APP for the State vehemently opposed the prayer of the petitioner for grant of bail by contending that petitioner has criminal antecedents also.

7. Considering the aforesaid facts, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, though, other co-accused has been granted bail by this Court.

8. Accordingly, this application is dismissed.

9. The trial Court is directed to expedite the trial of the petitioner and conclude the same at the earliest. If there is no sufficient progress in the trial due to the fault of the prosecution side then the petitioner may renew his prayer for grant of bail.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) Vikas/- U T