Chandrashekhar Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6273 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-676 Year-2018 Thana- BHABHUA District- Kaimur (Bhabua) * ====================================================== CHANDRASHEKHAR SINGH, son of Uday Narayan Singh, Resident of Village - Sirihiya, P.S. Chand, Dist. Kaimur (Bhabua) ... ... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Kumar Sunil For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Ajay Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 01-04-2019 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary corrections in paragraph-1 and prayer portion of the petition in the course of the day.
Petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in connection with Bhabua P.S. Case No. 676 of 2018, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 504, 506, 386, 307, 427 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation as per FIR is that earlier on 11.9.2018 four persons came to the restaurant of the informant in drunken condition and they were arrested and later on accused persons, including the petitioner came there variously armed and assaulted the informant.
Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that petitioner is not named in the FIR and as a matter of fact
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6273 of 2019(4) dt.01-04-2019 2/2 they were protesting regarding sub-standard of meal supplied by the informant and as such they have been made accused in this case.
Heard learned APP also, who has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner stating that on CCTV footage petitioner and others were identified and earlier there was a case against him.
Having heard both sides and in the facts and circumstances, I am not inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner, rather he should surrender and make prayer for regular bail, which shall be considered on its own merit, without being prejudiced by this order. With the above observation, this application is dismissed.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U T