M/S Ravindra Nath Mukherjee Ayurvedic Chikitsa Mahavidyalaya, v. The Central Council Of Indian Medicine,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.207 of 2020 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13146 of 2018 ====================================================== M/s Ravindra Nath Mukherjee Ayurvedic Chikitsa Mahavidyalaya, East Champaran, through its Governing Body and person authorised Sri Shambhu Nath Sikaria S/o Late Radha Krishna Sikaria, Resident of Radha Nagar, Motihari, East Champaran, Bihar.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The Central Council of Indian Medicine, through Dr. Deopujari Jayant Yeshwant, Male, aged about not known to the petitioner, son of not known to the petitioner, President, Jawahar Lal Nehru Bhartiya Chikitsa Avam Homeopathy Anusandhan Bhawan, 61-65 Institutional Area, Janakpuri D Block, New Delhi-110058.
2.
The Union of India through Mr. Vaidya Rajesh Kotecha, Male, aged about not known to this petitioner, Son of not known to the petitioner, Secretary, Ministry of AYUSH, Government of India, B Block, GPO Complex, INA, New Delhi-110023.
3.
Pramod Kumar Pathak, Son of not known to the petitioner, aged about not known to this petitioner, The Under-Secretary, Ministry of AYUSH, Government of India, B Block, GPO Complex, INA, New Delhi-110023. 4.
The State of Bihar through Mr. Sanjay Kumar, I.A.S., Male, aged about not known to the petitioner, Son of not known to the petitioner, Principal Secretary, Department of Health, Government of Bihar, Patna. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Vikash Kumar Jha, Advocate Mr. Prince Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Ramadhar Singh (GP 25) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 25-07-2024 Mr. Vikash Kumar Jha, learned counsel on the instruction of Mr. Prince Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the petition.
2. Accordingly, the MJC No. 207 of 2020 stands dismissed as withdrawn.
(Rajiv Roy, J) kiran/- U