← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/10607/2017dismiss for nonprosecution

Hari Shankar Singh And ANR v. Union Bank Of India And ORS

2025-05-13Justice Smt. G. Anupama Chakravarthy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10607 of 2017 ====================================================== 1.

Hari Shankar Singh, Son of Late Ram Subhag Singh 2.

Smt. Rubby Singh W/o Shri Hari Shankar Singh Both residents of Village and Post Mohammadpur, Police Station Garkha, District Saran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

Union Bank Of India, having its Head Office at Union Bank Bhawan Opposite Vidhan Bhawan, 239 Vidhan Bhavan Marg, Nariman Point, Mumbai, India - 400021.

2.

The Zonal Manager, Union Bank of India, 53, Abhay Bhawan, Frazer Road, Patna, Bihar - 800001.

3.

The Regional Manager Union Bank of India Regional Office Samastipur, Panchawati Complex, Mohanpur R 4.

The Authorised Officer, Union Bank of India Regional Office, Samastipur, Panchwati Complex, Mohanpu 5.

The Branch Manager, Union Bank of India Chapra Branch, Srinandan Path, Salempur, Chapra Saran.

6.

The State of Bihar through the Director Industry Department, Bihar, Patna. 7.

The Deputy Director, the State of Bihar Industry Department, Patna, Bihar. 8.

The Regional Manager, Reserve Bank of India, Gandhi Maidan, Patna. 9.

The Asstt. Manager, R.B.I. Gandhi Maidan, Patna. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

None For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Abbas Haider, SC-6 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. G. ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY ORAL ORDER 13-05-2025

1. This Court passed an order on 12.05.2025, which reads as follows:

"1. No representation on behalf of the petitioners.

2. A detailed counter affidavit was filed by the respondents herein.

3. For finally hearing the Learned counsel for the petitioners, list on

Patna High Court CWJC No.10607 of 2017(3) dt.13-05-2025 2/2 13.05.2025, as a last indulgence."

2. Inspite of the said order, today also there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. Therefore, the Writ petition is dismissed for default and for non-prosecution. (G. Anupama Chakravarthy, J) khushbu/- U