Ajit Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6699 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-13 Year-2025 Thana- NIMCHAKBATHANI District- Gaya ====================================================== Ajit Kumar S/o Sajay Ram R/o Village - Baraini, P.S.- Nimchak Bathani, District - Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Raj Kishor Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Kumar Veerendra Narayan, A.P.P.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 22-04-2026
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109(2), 329(4), 352, 351(2), 351(3) and 3(5) of the BNS, 2023.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that accused persons came and petitioner along with Surendra Ram assaulted his mother, namely, Mano Devi by rod and Chapra causing injury on her head and thereafter the accused persons threatened and said to leave the village.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant on account of dispute relating to land. It is further submitted that informant and his side are trying to grab the land of the petitioner by deceitful means. It is next submitted that no doubt,
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6699 of 2026(2) dt.22-04-2026 2/2 petitioner is alleged to have assaulted the mother of the informant with Surendra Ram but then petitioner is not a criminal and is in custody since 09.09.2025 and charge-sheet has been submitted. It is also submitted that if the privilege of regular bail is granted to the petitioner, the petitioner will not abscond rather will cooperate in the trial to prove his innocence.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, the petitioner, abovenamed, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court where the case is pending in connection with Nimchak Bathani P.S. Case No. 13 of 2025.
7. However, it is made clear that if the learned Trial Court comes to a conclusion that the petitioner, after his release on bail, is trying to delay the trial of the case in any manner, the learned Trial Court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Kundan/- U T