Moti Lal Uraon v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8244 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-281 Year-2017 Thana- CHHATAPUR District- Supaul ====================================================== MOTI LAL URAON Son of Lakshmi Uraon R/o village - Fatehpur Ward No.- 11, P.S.- Narpatganj, District - Araria ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Patla Kumari For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Shantanu Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 08-05-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner has prayed for bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 363, 365, 366, 120B and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The allegation against the petitioner along with another is of kidnapping the daughter of the informant. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He has committed no offence. He submitted that nobody has seen the alleged kidnapping of the informant's daughter by this petitioner but he has been made accused in the present case. He further submitted that prior to marriage of the victim, there might be love affairs from any person, whom she identified and opened the door

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8244 of 2023(3) dt.08-05-2023 2/2 in the night and fled away. Petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 25.08.2022.

Learned APP for the State has opposed the application for bail and submitted that the victim girl specifically stated about the complicity of this petitioner and another in her statement, which has recorded u/s 164 of the Cr.P.C., that when she opened the door in night, they tied her mouth and sprayed upon her, due to which she became senseless. Thereafter, on next morning, when she woke up and found herself in train with this petitioner and others. The petitioner along with other persons taken her to Punjab and this petitioner kept her in a rented room and after threatening used to commit rape upon her several times.

Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and considering the nature of allegation, this court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail and, as such, his prayer for bail stands rejected.

The trial Court is directed to conclude the trial expeditiously.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) arish/- U T