Rohit Kumar Choudhary v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6077 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-715 Year-2020 Thana- KATIHAR COMPLAINT CASE District- Katihar ====================================================== Rohit Kumar Choudhary Son of Sanjay Choudhary Resident of villageMurli, PS- Jalai, District- Saharsa (Wrongly mentioned in the Complaint petition as resident of Mohalla- Rampur Khurd Purani Saray Nathnagar, P.S.- Nathnagar, Distt.- Bhagalpur) ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar 2.
Khushi Singh Wife of Rohit Kumar Chaudrhary, D/O- Malanand Singh Resident of Village- Basgarha, P.S.- Korha, Dist.- Katihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Bimal Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Nitya Nand Tiwary, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 24-02-2025
1. The instant application has been filed by the petitioner praying for grant of anticipatory bail apprehending his arrest in connection with C.A. Case no.715 of 2020 registered under sections 498A, 494 and 323 of the Indian Penal Code.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in a connected Cr. Misc. no.4854 of 2025, the petitioner herein has challenged the order taking cognizance. By order dated 31.1.2025 passed therein, this Court has been pleased to issue notice to the opposite party no.2 and has further directed that further proceedings with respect to C.A. Case no.715 of 2020 pending in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class,
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6077 of 2025(2) dt.24-02-2025 2/2 Katihar from which the instant application also arises shall remain stayed till further orders.
3. In view of the aforesaid order dated 31.1.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. no.4854 of 2025, in the opinion of this Court, the petitioner has no apprehension of arrest and as such, the instant application is disposed of.
4. It goes without saying that the petitioner will be at liberty to renew his prayer for anticipatory bail in case the need so arises.
(Partha Sarthy, J) Saurabh/- U T