Kashi Ram v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6120 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-355 Year-2022 Thana- KOCHAS District- Rohtas ====================================================== 1.

KASHI RAM SON OF RAM NARAYAN RAM R/O VILL.- SHAHMAL KHAIRA, P.S.- KOCHAS, DISTT.- ROHTAS AT SASARAM 2.

SURENDRA RAM SON OF MAHAVIR RAM R/O VILL.- SHAHMAL KHAIRA, P.S.- KOCHAS, DISTT.- ROHTAS AT SASARAM 3.

BIRENDRA RAM SON OF MAHAVIR RAM R/O VILL.- SHAHMAL KHAIRA, P.S.- KOCHAS, DISTT.- ROHTAS AT SASARAM 4.

JHUNJHUN RAM SON OF RAM PRASAD DIWANA R/O VILL.- SHAHMAL KHAIRA, P.S.- KOCHAS, DISTT.- ROHTAS AT SASARAM ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Raghunandan Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ram Anurag Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 11-04-2023 Heard the parties.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 379, 307, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The allegation against the petitioners is that they assaulted the informant by means of lathi and danda due to which he sustained injuries. It is also alleged that the petitioners snatched golden chain and Rs.10,000/- from the pocket of the informant. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6120 of 2023(2) dt.11-04-2023 2/2 They have been falsely implicated in this case. No such occurrence, in the manner as alleged, has ever taken place. The allegation levelled against the petitioners is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. He further submits that the injuries are simple in nature, evident from Annexure-3 of the bail application. He further submits that there is a compromise between the parties. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent. Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners, be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Kochas P.S. Case No.355 of 2022, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) shikha/- U T