Patna High CourtCR. MISC./23580/2016bail granted

Raghubansh Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2016-06-22Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.23580 of 2016 (2) dt.22-06-2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.23580 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -41 Year- 2015 Thana -KACHHAWA District- SASARAM (ROHTAS) ======================================================

1. Raghubansh Singh Son of Late Hari Narain Singh resident of village + P.O. Danwar, P.S. Kachhawa, District - Rohtas.... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sada Nand Roy For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rajendra Pd. Nat(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 22-06-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State.

The petitioner wants to renew his prayer of bail, which was earlier rejected vide order dated 14.03.2016 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 51995 of 2015, on the ground that the petitioner being aged about 85 years is in custody since 06.07.2015 and liberty was given to him to renew the prayer for bail after framing of charge but charges have already been framed earlier which was not pointed out at that time and in near future the trial is not likely to be concluded.

Learned APP duly assisted by learned counsel for the informant opposes the prayer of bail.

In the facts and circumstances stated above, considering the period of detention and further considering the age of the petitioner, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.23580 of 2016 (2) dt.22-06-2016 bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sessions Judge, Rohtas at Sasaram in S. Tr. No. 22 of 2016 arising out of Kachhawan P.S. Case No. 41 of 2015, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) avin/- U T