Mangan Rishi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6356 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-570 Year-2021 Thana- PURNEA SADAR District- Purnia ====================================================== 1.

MANGAN RISHI, S/o late Bodhi Rishi.

2.

Raj Kumar Rishi S/o Ramu Rishi.

Both Resident of Village- Rajiganj, Musahari Tola, P.S. - Mufassil, District- Purnea.

... ... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners :

Mr. Ajit Ranjan Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party :

Ms. Pronoti Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 07-03-2022 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to remove defect(s), as pointed out by the office, if any, within a period of four weeks from today.

This application for grant of anticipatory bail arises out of Sadar (Muffasil) P.S. Case No. 570 of 2021 registered for the offence under Sections 272 and 273 of the Indian Penal code and under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Prohibition Act. In view of the fact that prima facie a case under the Excise Act, is made out against the petitioners, this application for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners is not maintainable in view of Full Bench decision of this Court rendered in the case of Ram Vinay Yadav vs. The State of Bihar reported in 2019(2) P.L.J.R. 1089 (F.B.).

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6356 of 2022(2) dt.07-03-2022 2/2 Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed as not maintainable.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) pawan/- U T