Rajeshwar Prasad And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.798 of 2019 ====================================================== 1.
Rajeshwar Prasad and Ors Son of late Narayan Prasad Resident of VillageMajhanura, P.O. Nadpura, Via- Hazarat Sain, P.S. Dhanarua, District- Patna. 2.
Ramkhelawan Kewat Son of Sukan Kewat Resident of Village- Majhanura, P.O. Nadpura, Via- Hazarat Sain, P.S. Dhanarua, District- Patna. 3.
Lalit Lal S/o late Ram Pravesh Prasad Resident of Village- Majhanura, P.O. Nadpura, Via- Hazarat Sain, P.S. Dhanarua, District- Patna. 4.
Mithilesh Singh S/o late Ramdhyan Singh Resident of Village- Majhanura, P.O. Nadpura, Via- Hazarat Sain, P.S. Dhanarua, District- Patna. 5.
Braj Kishore Prasad S/o late Damodar Bhagat Resident of VillageMajhanura, P.O. Nadpura, Via- Hazarat Sain, P.S. Dhanarua, District- Patna. 6.
Yogendra Ram S/o late Sakaldeo Ram Resident of Village- Majhanura, P.O. Nadpura, Via- Hazarat Sain, P.S. Dhanarua, District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State Of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue and Land Reforms, Bihar, Patna.
2.
The Secretary, Rural Works Department, Bihar, Patna 3.
The Collector-Cum-District Magistrate, Patna. 4.
The Additional Collector-Cum-Additional District Magistrate, Patna. 5.
The District Land Acquisition Officer, Patna 6.
The Executive Engineer, Rural Works Department, Works Division, Masaurhi, Patna.
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
None For the Respondent/s :
Mr.Md. Khurshid Alam, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 06-02-2025 None appears on behalf of the petitioners, however, learned counsel for the State is present.
2. On 23.01.2025, the following order has been passed :- "No one appears on behalf of the
Patna High Court CWJC No.798 of 2019(4) dt.06-02-2025 2/2 petitioners. However, learned Counsel for the State is present.
2. As a matter of last indulgence, this case is adjourned for one week with a specific direction that if none appears on behalf of the petitioners on the next appointed date then appropriate order shall be passed.
3. Put up this case on 31.01.2025."
4. Today also upon repeated calls, none appeared on behalf of the petitioners. It appears to this Court that the petitioners are not interested in pursuing the matter any further.
5. As such, the present writ petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution.
(Dr. Anshuman, J) Ashwini/- U