← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./6564/2022allowed

Manoj Ray v. The State Of Bihar

2022-06-16Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6564 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-446 Year-2020 Thana- BARH District- Patna ====================================================== 1.

MANOJ RAY Son of Late Ramji Ray Resident of Village - Pachhiyari Malahi, P.S.- Barh, Distt.- Patna.

2.

Mukesh Ray @ Mukesh Kumar Son of Sakal Ray Resident of Village - Pachhiyari Malahi, P.S.- Barh, Distt.- Patna. 3.

Ram Kishore Ray @ Kishore Ray Son of Bindeshwar Ray Resident of Village - Pachhiyari Malahi, P.S.- Barh, Distt.- Patna. 4.

Rabind Ray Son of Yogi Ray Resident of Village - Pachhiyari Malahi, P.S.- Barh, Distt.- Patna.

5.

Satish Ray Son of Nawal Ray Resident of Village - Pachhiyari Malahi, P.S.- Barh, Distt.- Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ajay Kr Singh No.1, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 16-06-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. It is a case of recovery of about 108 liters of country made liquor from the bank of Ganga river.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. He

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6564 of 2022(2) dt.16-06-2022 2/2 further submits that they have no concern with the seized liquor and no incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious or constructive possession of the petitioners and petitioners have not been apprehended at the spot. Petitioners have got clean antecedent.

Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

Considering the aforesaid submissions, let the petitioners, above named in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special JudgeExcise, Patna in connection with Barh P.S. Case No. 446 of 2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Brajesh Kumar/- U T