Krishna Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6695 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-51 Year-2018 Thana- SASARAM MUFFSIL District- Rohtas ====================================================== Krishna Yadav Son of Late Babulal Yadav Resident of Village Ghatmapur, P.S.- Sasaram (M), District - Rohtas.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Ranju Devi W/o Krishna Yadav , D/o Khobhari Singh Resident of Village - Lohradih, P.S.- Rajpur, District- Rohtas.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr.Siddharth Harsh, Advocate For the Opposite Party :

Mrs.Anita Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 26-04-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in connection with Sasaram (M) P.S. Case No.51 of 2018 registered for the offences under Sections 498A and 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code and under Sections 3/ 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Specific statement has been made in paragraph 8 of the bail application that the petitioner is ready to keep the opposite party no.2 with full honour and dignity.

In such view of the matter, the petitioner is directed to visit his Sasural and take opposite party no.2 with him before 9th of May, 2022 and thereafter both the parties will file an application in the Court below that they have amicably settled their disputes and they are staying together. The petitioner will

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6695 of 2022(4) dt.26-04-2022 2/2 also provide a separate mobile phone and number to opposite party no.2 from which she can talk to her parents as and when she desires.

On filing of the aforesaid application by both the parties in the Court below, the Court below will release the petitioner on provisional bail for a period of three months on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sasaram in connection with Sasaram (M) P.S. Case No.51 of 2018, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Till filing of the application by the opposite party no.2 and her husband in the court below, the petitioner shall not be arrested in connection with aforesaid case.

It is made clear that for non compliance of this order, bail bond of the petitioner shall stand automatically cancelled. This application is, accordingly, disposed of. (Sandeep Kumar, J) BT/- U T