← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./5504/2025bail granted

Bhagat Lal Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2025-02-25Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5504 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-121 Year-2024 Thana- BHAWANIPUR District- Purnia ====================================================== 1.

Bhagat Lal Yadav Son of Late Sukhdev Yadav Resident of Shishwa,Ward no 15, PS- Bhawanipur, Distt.- Purnea 2.

Anand Kumar Son of Bhagat Lal Yadav Resident of Shishwa,Ward no 15, PS- Bhawanipur, Distt.- Purnea ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sanjeev Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ram Sevak Choudhary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 25-02-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence under Sections 341, 323, 307, 379, 447, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, on 15.06.2024 at about 7:00 AM, all the F.I.R. named accused persons including these petitioners abused and assaulted informant and his family members with lathi-danda, due to which, they sustained injury. It is further alleged that petitioner no. 2 assaulted on the head of informant and on shoulder of his daughter by means of lathi. It is also alleged that accused person snatched gold locket from the neck of informant's son.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5504 of 2025(2) dt.25-02-2025 2/2

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that both parties are Gotiyas and due to land dispute, a simple Maarpeet took place. Injury, allegedly caused by petitioner no. 2 to informant and his daughter, is simple in nature. F.I.R. has been lodged after a delay of seven days and there is no plausible explanation of delay. Case and counter case. Petitioners claim clean antecedent.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the bail petition.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the above named petitioners, in the event of their arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purnea in connection with Bhawanipur P.S. Case No. 121 of 2024, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) anay U T