Patna High CourtCR. MISC./4792/2020dismissed

Pramod Nut v. The State Of Bihar

2020-01-29Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4792 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-909 Year-2019 Thana- BIHTA District- Patna ====================================================== PRAMOD NUT Son of Shri Nut, Resident of Village - Shikandarpur, P.S.- Bihta, District- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shaishav Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Anand Kishore Choudhary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 29-01-2020 Heard the parties.

The petitioner seeks bail in Bihta P.S. Case No.909 of 2019 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 394, 411 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per the prosecution case, while the informant was coming after purchasing rice from a village, he saw coming a tempo coming from Bihta Bazar on which three accused persons were sitting. It is alleged that all accused persons named in the F.I.R. including the petitioner snatched Rs.28,500/- on the point of knife and they have been arrested by the police. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and he is in custody since 02.10.2019. Further submission is that nothing has been recovered from the possession of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4792 of 2020(2) dt.29-01-2020 2/2 petitioner, rather the amount is alleged to be recovered from coaccused Shahid Alam. The petitioner is only a passenger on the said tempo.

Heard learned Addl. Public Prosecutor, who has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits that he is also accused in one more case.

Be that as it may, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail at this stage, however once the charge is framed in this case, the petitioner is at liberty to renew his prayer for bail.

With the aforesaid observation, this application for bail is dismissed.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) nawalkrs/- U T