← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./8294/2025bail granted

Sushil Kumar Sahu v. ,The State Of Bihar

2025-02-17Mr. Justice R. P. Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8294 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-341 Year-2024 Thana- Excise P.S. District- Madhubani ====================================================== 1.

Sushil Kumar Sahu Son of Vijay Kumar Sahu Resident of Village - Dullipatti, P.S - Jaynagar, District - Madhubani 2.

Mahendra Sahni Son of Late Nand Sahani Resident of Village - Pursauliya, P.S. - Kaluahi, District - Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms Nityanand Tiwary, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 17-02-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2.

The petitioners seek bail in connection with Sadar Excise PS Case No. 341 of 2024 instituted for the offences under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. 3.

The prosecution case, in short, is that total 84 litres of country made liquor was recovered from E-Rickshaw. 4.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in the present case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioners. The petitioners have got no concern with the alleged recovery of liquor. It is submitted that petitioner no. 1 is the owner and petitioner no. 2

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8294 of 2025(2) dt.17-02-2025 2/2 is the passenger of the seized vehicle and they have no knowledge regarding the nature of goods kept in the vehicle. The petitioners are in custody since 13.12.2024 and has got no criminal antecedent. There is no compliance of Section 100 of Cr.P.C.

5.

Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioners. 6.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, clean antecedent of the petitioners and the period of custody undergone by the petitioners, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioners.

7.

Let the petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Sadar Excise PS Case No. 341 of 2024.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Raj Ranjan/- U T