Patna High CourtCR. MISC./6900/2026bail rejected

Pramod Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2026-05-05Mr. Justice Purnendu Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6900 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-46 Year-2025 Thana- MEHUSH District- Sheikhpura ====================================================== 1.

Pramod Kumar S/O Late Binod Mahto Resident of Village- Deole, Police Station- Sheikhpura, Distt.- Sheikhpura, Bihar. 2.

Subodh Kumar S/O Late Binod Mahto R/O Village- Deole, P.S- Sheikhpura, Dist.- Sheikhpura, Bihar.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Anil Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ajit Kumar, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 05-05-2026 Heard Mr. Anil Kumar Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and Mr. Ajit Kumar, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners seek pre-arrest bail in connection with Mehus P.S. Case No. 46 of 2025 registered for the offence(s) punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 331(8), 351(3), 61(2) and 3(5) of the BNS.

3. As per the allegation made in the FIR, petitioners, with an intention to kill, had allegedly assaulted the son and daughter-in-law of the informant causing injuries.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submitted that petitioners are innocent and they have

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6900 of 2026(5) dt.05-05-2026 2/2 falsely been implicated in the present case. Petitioners have clean antecedent. On these grounds, petitioners seek to be released on pre-arrest bail.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioners and submitted that already process under Sections 83 and 84 of the BNSS has been issued against the petitioners and from the injury report it appears that injury sustained by the son of the informant, which is attributable to the petitioners, has been opined by the doctor to be grievous in nature.

6. Considering the nature of allegation, as well as, the progress, which has taken place, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioners on pre-arrest bail.

7. Accordingly, the present application stands dismissed.

(Purnendu Singh, J) Niraj/- U T