Uday Choudhari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1857 of 2022 ====================================================== Uday Choudhari Son of Late Ramswarup Choudhari Resident of VillageParham, Police Station- Nayaramnagar, District- Munger. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Secretary, Excise Department, Bihar, Patna. 2.

The District Magistrate, Munger.

3.

The Superintendent of Police, Munger.

4.

The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Munger.

5.

The Circle Officer, Jamalpur, District- Munger. 6.

The Officer In charge, Nayaramnagar, Police Station- Munger, DistrictMunger. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ratnakar Ambastha, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Kumar Manish (S.C. 5) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR) (The proceedings of the Court are being conducted through Video Conferencing and the Advocates joined the proceedings through Video Conferencing from their residence.) Date : 22-04-2022 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner has prayed for the following relief(s):- "(i) For issuance of writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to forthwith release the room of the petitioner which was quite illegally and arbitrary sealed on 10.07.2021 in connection with Nayaramnagar Police Station Case No. 118/2021 dated 10.07.2021 instituted under Section 30(a)/32 of the Bihar Prohibition Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018.

(ii) For issuance of any other appropriate writ(s) or order(s) or direction(s) which may be deemed fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case."

Patna High Court CWJC No.1857 of 2022 dt.22-04-2022 2/2 It is submitted that during pendency of this writ petition, the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed, as such, he prays for withdrawal of the present petition. This writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Equally, liberty reserved to petitioner to approach this Court for same and subsequent cause of action, if need so arises.

(Sanjay Karol, CJ) ( S. Kumar, J) Rajiv/veenaAFR/NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date Transmission Date