Vindeshwar Yadav @ Bindeshwar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5750 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-334 Year-2025 Thana- ADAPUR District- East Champaran ====================================================== Vindeshwar Yadav @ Bindeshwar Yadav S/o Late Makuni Rai R/o Village - Imilwa Bishunpurwa, P.S - Adapur, District - East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Kundan Rathore Alias Kundan Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Syed Ehteshamuddin ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT KUMAR ORAL ORDER 24-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Adapur P.S. Case No.334 of 2025, dated 10.09.2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(1), 118(1), 109, 352, 351(2), 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

3. As per the FIR, on account of land dispute, the petitioner and other co-accused persons attacked the informant's side by means of sticks, bamboo sticks and spade due to which the informant's side received injuries.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that although there is an allegation of overt act

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5750 of 2026(3) dt.24-02-2026 2/3 against the petitioner, the injuries sustained by the injured persons are simple in nature. He further submits that there is a case and counter-case between the parties. It is also submitted that there is a delay of 23 days in the registration of the FIR, which casts doubt on the genuineness of the prosecution story. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner undertakes not to indulge in any similar offence in the near future and that, if the allegations against the petitioner are found to be true, the police officials shall be at liberty to take appropriate steps for cancellation of his bail. Lastly, it is submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedents.

5. On the other hand, the learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned CJM, East Champaran, Motihari/ Successor Court in connection with Adapur P.S. Case No.334 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS as well as the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5750 of 2026(3) dt.24-02-2026 3/3 following conditions:

(i) One of the bailors should be the family member/relative/known of the petitioner(s) who shall provide official document/ personal affidavit to show his/her bona fide; (ii) the petitioner(s) shall appear on each and every date before the Trial Court and failure to do so for two consecutive dates without plausible reason will entail cancellation of his/her/their bail bond by the Trial Court itself; (iii) the petitioner(s) shall in no way try to induce or promise or threat the witnesses or tamper with the evidences, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of the bail bonds;

(iv) the petitioner(s) shall desist from committing any similar criminal offence again, failing which the State/ police officials shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of their bail bonds.

(Ajit Kumar, J) shikha/- U T