Md. Sarvar @ Gulam Sarver v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6166 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-208 Year-2024 Thana- AAJAM NAGAR District- Katihar ====================================================== 1.

Md. Sarvar @ Gulam Sarver Son of Late Yasin Resident of Village- Singhol, P.S.- Azamnagar, District- Katihar 2.

Md. Mahboob Alam @ Mahboob Alam Son of Mofiruddin Resident of VillMadanpur, P.S.- Salmari, District- Katihar 3.

Ansar Alam @ Md. Ansar Alam Son of Md. Razzaqua Resident of VillMadanpur, P.S.- Salmari, District- Katihar 4.

Husnera Khatoon @ Husne Ara Wife of Ansar Alam Resident of VillMadanpur, P.S.- Salmari, District- Katihar 5.

Munni Khatoon @ Jinnat Begum Wife of Mahboob Alam Resident of VillMadanpur, P.S.- Salmari, District- Katihar 6.

Gulam Hasnain Mustafa @ Md. Gulam Hasnan Mustafa Son of Mofiruddin Resident of Vill- Madanpur, P.S.- Salmari, District- Katihar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar Patna 2.

Musarat Parveen Wife of Gulam Hasnain Mustafa, D/O- Mahmood Alam Resident of Vill- Vishanpur, P.S.- Harishchandrapur, District- Malda (W.B.) ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Md Musowir, Adv For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Arun Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 17-06-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 and learned APP for the State.

2. Petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 498A, 363, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6166 of 2025(4) dt.17-06-2025 2/3

3. The case is one under section 498A and the petitioners are husband and other family members. The allegation in the FIR is with regard to demand of dowry and torture.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners however submits that the allegations are not correct. The matter has been compromised between the parties and a joint compromise petition has also been brought on record by way of Annexure-2 to the petition.

5. The learned counsel appearing for the opposite party no. 2 also supports the stand of the petitioner that the petitioner and opposite party no. 2 are staying together as husband and wife and are having cordial relation between them.

6. Considering all the above mentioned facts and circumstances, I am inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, in the event of their arrest/ surrender within a period of four weeks from today the petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- (ten thousand)with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/ successor court in Complaint Case No.208 of 2024, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C and subject to the further condition that the petitioner

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6166 of 2025(4) dt.17-06-2025 3/3 shall co-operate in investigation/ trial.

(Soni Shrivastava, J) N.K/- U T