← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./6198/2026bail granted

Ankush Kumar@Tandeli v. The State Of Bihar

2026-02-04Mr. Justice Sourendra Pandey3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6198 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1165 Year-2025 Thana- JAHANABAD District- Jehanabad ====================================================== Ankush Kumar@Tandeli S/O Late Mukesh Kumar R/O Vill - Babhana, P.S - Jehanabad,Dist- Jehanabad ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Pritish Kumar Lal, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ahmad Ali, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOURENDRA PANDEY ORAL ORDER 04-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seek bail in anticipation of his arrest in connection with Jehanabad P.S. Case No. 1165 of 2025 instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 352, 351(2) and 303(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner is said to have assaulted the informant giving multiple blows and causing injuries. It is alleged that a golden chain was also snatched away.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated and no such occurrence, as alleged, has taken place. It has further been submitted that the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6198 of 2026(2) dt.04-02-2026 2/3 injuries sustained is not corroborated by the allegations, as from the perusal of the injury report only one wound, that too lacerated wound at the back of hip was found and the same was also stated to be simple in nature. Lastly, it has been submitted that the petitioner has clean antecedent.

5. Learned APP appearing on behalf of the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

6. Considering the facts aforesaid, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, on his furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jehanabad in connection with Jehanabad P.S. Case No. 1165 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 of the BNSS and subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner;

(ii) the petitioner will remain present on each and every date fixed by the Court below, if so required by the learned Trial Court;

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6198 of 2026(2) dt.04-02-2026 3/3 (iii) in case of absence on two consecutive dates or in violation of the terms of the bail, the bail bonds of the petitioner will liable to be cancelled by the Court concerned; (iv) the Court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bonds of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of the same on in the name of verification.

7. It is made clear that the observations, if any, made in this order, shall be of no bearing during the trial. (Sourendra Pandey, J) krishna/- U T