Rajesh Kumar Singh v. The State Election Commission Panchayat And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3910 of 2018 ====================================================== Rajesh Kumar Singh son of Narendra Kishore Singh Resident of village - Mathia Bhopat, P.S. - Lakhaura, District - East Champaran at Motihari. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Election Commission Panchayat, 3rd Floor, Sone Bhawan, Birchand Patel Path, Patna through the State Election Commissioner 2.

The District Election Officer Panchayat, East Champaran at Motihari, District - East Champaran at Motihari 3.

The Block Development Officer-cum-Returning Officer, Bankatwa Block, P.O. and P.S. Bankatwa, District East Champaran at Motihari 4.

Kiran Devi wife of Rakesh Kumar Resident of village Inarwa Phoolwar, P.S. Lakhaura, District - East Champaran at Motihari. 5.

Ajay Kumar son of Late Dineshwar Rai Resident of village Inarwa Phoolwar, P.S. Lakhaura, District - East Champaran at Motihari. 6.

Bharoshi Sah son of Late Lakshman Sah Resident of village Inarwa Phoolwar, P.S. Lakhaura, District - East Champaran at Motihari. 7.

Jai Shankar Rai son of Late Ganesh Rai Resident of village - Mathia Bhopat, P.S. - Lakhaura, District - East Champaran at Motihari. 8.

Mukesh Singh son of Rampati Singh Resident of village - Mathia Bhopat, P.S. - Lakhaura, District - East Champaran at Motihari. 9.

Gaya Shankar Prasad son of Late Kailash Lal Resident of village Inarwa, P.S. Lakhaura, District - East Champaran at Motihari. 10.

Sitaram Prasad Yadav son of Late Daroga Rai Resident of village - Godhia, P.S. - Lakhaura, District - East Champaran at Motihari. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. S.B.K. Mangalam, Advocate Mr. Ravi Ranjan, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Amit Shrivastava, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 21-03-2023 Heard Mr. S.B.K. Mangalam learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that by efflux of time the writ application has become infructuous and, thus, seeks permission to withdraw the same.

Patna High Court CWJC No.3910 of 2018(5) dt.21-03-2023 2/2 Permission is accorded.

Accordingly, the writ application is dismissed as withdrawn.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Kundan/- U