Patna High CourtCR. MISC./7933/2026dismissed

Enaam Khan v. The State Of Bihar

2026-06-23Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7933 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-535 Year-2025 Thana- BHABHUA District- Kaimur (Bhabua) ====================================================== Enaam Khan S/O Irshad Ahmad Khan Resident of Village- Ujari Sikthi, P.SBhabhua, District- Kaimur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Allama Abdul Quadir Jamal Faridi, Advocate For the State :

Mr.Shyam Kumar Singh, APP For the Informant :

Mr. Kanhaiya Rao, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 23-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner; learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the informant.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Bhabhua P.S. Case No. 535 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 103, 352, 351(2), 61(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Sections 25(1-AA), 26, 27 and 35 of the Arms Act.

3. The petitioner and other accused persons are said to have brutally assaulted the informant and his brother and are alleged to have shot the brother of the informant.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7933 of 2026(4) dt.23-06-2026 2/2

5. The petitioner is in custody since 01.07.2025.

6. Learned APP appearing for the State and learned counsel for the informant have opposed the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner.

7. The petitioner is the assailant of the deceased. The witnesses in the course of trial have supported the case of the prosecution. The postmortem report also supports the case of the prosecution.

8. Considering the aforesaid facts and the nature of allegation, I am not inclined to grant regular bail to the petitioner.

9. Accordingly, the application stands dismissed.

10. It is, however, clarified that the observations made herein are limited to the adjudication of the present bail application and shall not prejudice the case of the petitioner at any subsequent stage of the trial and this Court has not express any opinion on the merits of the case.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) P. Kumar U T